paper brief

Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets (arXiv:1411.1784) — Paper Brief

This paper introduces conditional generative adversarial nets (cGANs) by feeding a conditioning variable y to both the generator and discriminator, and reports demonstrations on MNIST class-conditional digit generation plus preliminary examples for multimodal modeling and image tagging.

February 22, 2026•Mira Vale•llm systems

Continue in Rorobot with the source paper open and ready for chat.

Open this paper in Rorobot

What this paper is about

Generative Adversarial Nets were recently introduced as a novel way to train generative models. [S1] This paper introduces the conditional version of generative adversarial nets. [S1] The paper states that the conditional model can be constructed by simply feeding the data y, which the model wishes to condition on, to both the generator and the discriminator. [S1] The paper reports that the conditional model can generate MNIST digits conditioned on class labels. [S1] The paper also illustrates how the conditional model could be used to learn a multi-modal model. [S1] The paper provides preliminary examples of an application to image tagging. [S1] In the image tagging examples, the paper reports a demonstration of generating descriptive tags that are not part of the training labels. [S1]

Core claims to remember

The paper’s primary construction claim is that a conditional generative adversarial net can be built by feeding the conditioning variable y to both the generator and discriminator. [S1] The paper reports an empirical demonstration where the conditional model generates MNIST digits conditioned on class labels. [S1] The paper states that it illustrates how the approach could be used to learn a multi-modal model. [S1] The paper reports preliminary examples where the approach is applied to image tagging. [S1] The paper reports that, in these image tagging examples, the approach can generate descriptive tags that are not part of the training labels. [S1]

Limitations and caveats

The paper characterizes its image tagging results as preliminary examples. [S1] The paper describes the multi-modal modeling discussion as an illustration of how the model could be used. [S1]

How to apply this in study or projects

Read the paper’s construction description that conditional generative adversarial nets can be built by feeding y to both the generator and discriminator, and rewrite it as a concise diagram of information flow into the two components. [S1] Reproduce the exact reported demonstration target by focusing on generating MNIST digits conditioned on class labels, and track how the conditioning variable is represented in the setup you study. [S1] Study the paper’s explanation of using the conditional model to learn a multi-modal model, and list the modalities and conditioning variables that the paper discusses in that illustration. [S1] Review the image tagging section and extract the steps in the preliminary examples where the approach generates descriptive tags that are not part of the training labels. [S1] Compare this paper’s conditioning mechanism to later vision-language training described as predicting which caption goes with which image on 400 million image-text pairs, and note that this later work uses natural language to reference learned visual concepts for zero-shot transfer. [S2] Contrast the cGAN formulation described here with diffusion probabilistic models that report high quality image synthesis using a weighted variational bound and a connection to denoising score matching with Langevin dynamics, and record which parts of the learning objective differ at the level described in the two papers. [S3] Place the conditional GAN approach alongside modern object detection engineering that combines features such as Cross-Stage-Partial-connections, Mosaic data augmentation, DropBlock regularization, and CIoU loss, and document how each paper defines its main intervention in one sentence. [S4]

Sources

[S1]arxiv.org
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
State-of-the-art computer vision systems are trained to predict a fixed set of predetermined object categories. This restricted form of supervision limits their generality and usability since additional labeled data is needed to specify any other visual concept. Learning directly from raw text about images is a promising alternative which leverages a much broader source of supervision. We demonstrate that the simple pre-training task of predicting which caption goes with which image is an efficient and scalable way to learn SOTA image representations from scratch on a dataset of 400 million (image, text) pairs collected from the internet. After pre-training, natural language is used to reference learned visual concepts (or describe new ones) enabling zero-shot transfer of the model to downstream tasks. We study the performance of this approach by benchmarking on over 30 different existing computer vision datasets, spanning tasks such as OCR, action recognition in videos, geo-localization, and many types of fine-grained object classification. The model transfers non-trivially to most tasks and is often competitive with a fully supervised baseline without the need for any dataset specific training. For instance, we match the accuracy of the original ResNet-50 on ImageNet zero-shot without needing to use any of the 1.28 million training examples it was trained on. We release our code and pre-trained model weights at https://github.com/OpenAI/CLIP.
Open source Back to article
[S2]arxiv.org
YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection
There are a huge number of features which are said to improve Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) accuracy. Practical testing of combinations of such features on large datasets, and theoretical justification of the result, is required. Some features operate on certain models exclusively and for certain problems exclusively, or only for small-scale datasets; while some features, such as batch-normalization and residual-connections, are applicable to the majority of models, tasks, and datasets. We assume that such universal features include Weighted-Residual-Connections (WRC), Cross-Stage-Partial-connections (CSP), Cross mini-Batch Normalization (CmBN), Self-adversarial-training (SAT) and Mish-activation. We use new features: WRC, CSP, CmBN, SAT, Mish activation, Mosaic data augmentation, CmBN, DropBlock regularization, and CIoU loss, and combine some of them to achieve state-of-the-art results: 43.5% AP (65.7% AP50) for the MS COCO dataset at a realtime speed of ~65 FPS on Tesla V100. Source code is at https://github.com/AlexeyAB/darknet

FAQ

What makes a GAN “conditional” in this paper?

The paper states that conditional generative adversarial nets can be constructed by feeding the conditioning variable y to both the generator and discriminator. [S1]

What results does the paper report as demonstrations?

The paper reports MNIST digit generation conditioned on class labels and provides preliminary image tagging examples that demonstrate generating descriptive tags not included in the training labels. [S1]