What this paper is about
The paper addresses the visualisation of image classification models that are learnt using deep Convolutional Networks (ConvNets). [S1] The paper considers two visualisation techniques that are both based on computing the gradient of the class score with respect to the input image. [S1] The paper describes the first technique as generating an image that maximises the class score, and it presents this as a way to visualise the notion of the class captured by a ConvNet. [S1] The paper cites Erhan et al. [S1] , 2009 in connection with generating an image that maximises the class score. [S1] The paper describes the second technique as computing a class saliency map that is specific to a given image and class. [S1] The paper reports that such saliency maps can be employed for weakly supervised object segmentation using classification ConvNets. [S1] The paper also states that it establishes a connection between gradient-based ConvNet visualisation methods and deconvolutional networks, and it cites Zeiler et al. [S1] , 2013 in that connection. [S1]
Core claims to remember
The paper states that it addresses the visualisation of image classification models learnt using deep ConvNets. [S1] The paper states that it considers two visualisation techniques based on computing the gradient of the class score with respect to the input image. [S1] The paper states that one technique generates an image that maximises the class score as a way to visualise the notion of the class captured by a ConvNet. [S1] The paper cites Erhan et al. [S1] , 2009 when describing the approach that generates an image maximising the class score. [S1] The paper states that the other technique computes a class saliency map that is specific to a given image and class. [S1] The paper reports that these class saliency maps can be employed for weakly supervised object segmentation using classification ConvNets. [S1] The paper states that it establishes a connection between gradient-based ConvNet visualisation methods and deconvolutional networks. [S1] The paper cites Zeiler et al. [S1] , 2013 in its stated connection to deconvolutional networks. [S1]
Limitations and caveats
The paper describes its visualisation approach in terms of two techniques that are both based on computing the gradient of a class score with respect to the input image. [S1] The paper presents these techniques in the context of visualising image classification models learnt using deep ConvNets. [S1] The paper describes one technique as generating an image that maximises the class score to visualise the notion of a class captured by a ConvNet. [S1] The paper describes the other technique as computing a class saliency map that is specific to a given image and class. [S1] The paper reports the use of class saliency maps for weakly supervised object segmentation using classification ConvNets. [S1] The paper states that it establishes a connection between gradient-based ConvNet visualisation methods and deconvolutional networks. [S1]
How to apply this in study or projects
Read the parts of the paper that define the two visualisation techniques as gradient computations of the class score with respect to the input image. [S1] Trace how the paper describes generating an image that maximises the class score in order to visualise the notion of a class captured by a ConvNet. [S1] Follow the paper’s description of computing a class saliency map for a specific image and a specific class. [S1] Study the example use described in the paper where class saliency maps are employed for weakly supervised object segmentation using classification ConvNets. [S1] Compare the paper’s gradient-based visualisation methods to the deconvolutional network connection that the paper states it establishes, including the cited reference to Zeiler et al. [S1] , 2013. [S1]